This matriarch is popular with the atheist liberals
who claim god has no place in our world.She has been mentioned on PZ Meyers (the anti-ID professor exposed in Expelled). She has thousands of google hits.I do
not suggest you comment in her blog. Comment here.This blog will discuss her
entries with Christ's view. By Christ's people. By people who want only to
please their Lord.I think she is a good mother. Good mothering is unrelated to
having truth. Faith is the most important part of childraising but God has given
us this space to discuss what happens when God is thrown out
Sounds pretty harmless. I mean, they said I was a good mother and all. But, somehow I knew that wouldn't last long. Sure enough, the next post says this:
Is Opossummomma honorable? She is an unbelieving neighbor which is why this blog will hope to be a beacon. When you live without God your path is muddied with unimportant things. Honorable behavior is not including making posts about the standards modesty has in the FLDS. They are not hurting opposummom but she has dismissing opinions on any subject that smells of faithfulness to God's
commands. You may be asking why we have to stand for blogs that do not tolerate
God and I would say to you that we must because we know the truth. There's a
list of blogs on her site that I feel God is telling me to address to you so
that we may spread the Gospel Word. We must live honorably.
How honorable is it to create a blog for the soul purpose of disassembling one person's life? How is it honorable to defend child predators (the FLDS men) or the religion that glorifies the abuse? My problems with the FLDS had nothing to do with modesty. My posts reflect that I object to the any system that makes children chattel. I'm opposed to religions that enslave young girls with no means or choice to find freedom.
Next came a diatribe against co-sleeping and breastfeeding, with the following gems of wisdom:
It's no wonder this generation is spoilt rotten. Pmom says don't let them
cry. Don't raise a voice or speak. Eat whenever you want because the baby
controls you. Sleep together like hippies.
Oh yes. This country is going to hell in a handbasket because parents around the world practice a custom older than the Bible itself.
O ho ho. Who is she to talk about morals when she opened her knees to Tom, Dick, and Harry? Abstinence works every time. What did she expect the church to say to her with that problem.
Actually, it only took one Dick to get me pregnant. Tom and Harry weren't necessary. I love how they claim to be all pro-life, clown car uterus freaks, but they'll shake their fingers at the way those babies came to be.
In the most confusing twist...the next blog entry links to a post I made long ago in my livejournal. It wasn't just any post, it was a post I made about a loss we suffered...in 2001!
He found a post from November of 2001 and assumed that the Tom I was talking about was him.
My comment on poss's blog has the following hiped up. I am the topic of a blog post even. How special am I?
Very special, apparently. I don't want to insult people who ride the short bus by comparing them to Tom, but what the hell? He's "special" alright. When I e-mailed him to ask what the fuck was his problem and how he could possibly imagine I was referring to him in a post from seven years ago, he said "I thought it was a recent post." No dumb shit! It wasn't. Even if it was recent, how egotistical can one man be? Jerk.
In this same post, we get another rehashing of co-sleeping.
The harm in cosleeping is it lets the child control the parents when the
parents should be parents. A kid can't be independent if mommy is insecure so
much to not let them sleep alone. Won't her kids be the oddballs when they
invite mom in the marital bed with the spouse.
You see a lady who is passion is kids I see a lady who has passion for herself.
Those of us who respect the word of God and parenting advice from Adam and Eve know differently about who we should respect.
The recent post is a load of stinkin feces calling catholics bad for expecting
respect in the church. PZ Meyers or whatever is a scandal monger who wants
attention. Oposs is learning from him.
Well, I do subscribe to the whole "master/apprentice" philosophy from Star Wars. What problem does Tom have with PZ? Did PZ steal his pet octopus or something? *rolls eyes* The next line, though, sums his entire position up very succinctly.
Cosleeping is not right. It means a child comes between man and wife where God
says no man should go.
How he has the balls to call me a "self-worshipping", "selfish" person beats me. For people who claim to strive for purity of thought and action, these people sure are focused on sex. It's all about sex: abortion, single mothers, co-sleeping, breastfeeding, and "a mother's role".
I think I'll stop here. But, I'll leave you with a comment from his latest temper tantrum.
Op-momma is relentless in cramming atheism in all of her childrens experiences. She took them to the zoo but saw no beauty from God. She saw her secular mumbo jumbo facts about a theory of evolution which theory would be a thing that has not be
proven. Did she care about her childrens hearts in the zoo or was her day about
attacking God by desperite attempt to deny His creation? She had a partner this
day at the zoo with another atheist.
She met for the first time at the zoo. I thought she wanted to protect her
children but meeting strangers is not protective. Do atheists always need to be
a group of secular skeptics in public places? I left a post in Oppossum's blog
and was attacked by the friend.
This guy's delusional. But, let's indulge him enough to see what Calladus said that constitutes an attack, shall we?
Calladus said...Saved Servant, if you're really and truly interested in saving
my soul, if you honestly want to save me from Hell, then you need to email me so
we can have an honest discussion.You can find my email address from my blog -
it's only a couple of clicks away.If I don't get an email, I'll assume you're
just posturing in public, displaying your righteousness in order to curry favor
with God in defiance of Matt. 6:1.That's an attack?
EDITED TO ADD - Some people have asked why I'm giving these people any attention or recognition. That's a fair question...one I toyed with for the last two weeks. I decided to acknowledge it because I was receiving multiple e-mails saying, "Have you seen this?"
I want to make one thing clear, though. I do not think these people are in any way harmful. For one, they live on the opposite coast. Second, like many of you, I doubted that they were for real. I asked them, in light of previous issues, to give me proof of their existence and they've done so to my satisfaction. I have their full names and a phone number which checks out.